Grapes of Wrath is not only a John
Steinbeck novel relaying the trials and tribulations of Okies on their way to
California pushed out of their homes because of the Dust Bowl, but also a 2009
Law Journal article by Kristen Cunnhingham that discusses the negative effects of
winery wastewater. What a clever title. (Non-bluebooked citation: GRAPES OF
WRATH? HOW THE UNITED STATES CAN REDUCE THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF WINERY
WASTEWATER, Kristen Cunningham, 20 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 223)
This blog will give a brief summary and overview of
said article.
I.
The Economy of Wine: The article begins with an
introduction to the increasing size and scale of winemaking in the United
States, and California in general. Citing a 2007 report by Congress, the
article notes that the winemaking industry contributes more than $162 billion
annually to the American economy. That’s a lot of money. California alone
produces 95% of the wine in America, and 61% of all the wine consumed in
America. Given those numbers, the economic impact of winemaking, in the United
States and California, is massive. With all industries that can create massive
positive economic impacts, there is generally a strong push by local, state,
and federal government to encourage growth in that industry (even if that impact
means increasing consumption of Alcohol. Let’s party!). However, beyond
encouraging a “nation of drunkards” thirst for booze, encouraging winemaking as
an industry also presents environmental problems. The article presents this
information as a way to introduce the idea that, this potential economic growth
must be accompanied by the regulations that take into account winery wastewater
and its effect on natural resources.
II.
Wastewater Concerns of Winemaking: Some of the concerns that
winery waste water include:
·
Discharges
of high levels of sugars: It doesn’t take much imagination
or insight to realize that winery wastewater will likely include high levels of
sugars. But what environmental effect do those sugars have when released into
the natural environment? Well, as the article explains, microbes in the water
are suddenly provided with an enormous food source, the associated consumption
gives rise to increased oxygen consumption creating an oxygen-deprived
environment that can suffocate the plant and animal life that depends on oxygen
for respiration. (I’m not a biological expert, but this reminds me of the “dead
zones” that occur due to fertilizer discharge – which I understand to basically
mean that fertilizer that is not absorbed in farms makes its way into
groundwater, and then ultimately into areas like the Gulf of Mexico, after
traversing the Mississippi, and ultimately leading to massive growths of algae
fed by fertilizers and ultimately altering the environment for other aquatic
plant and animal life. Rant over.)
·
Unforeseen
Chemical Reactions: Additionally, these sugars can
combine with other chemicals typically found in water and result in dangerous
chemical reactions. For example, sugars combined with chlorine - typically
found in drinking water sources – can result in carcinogenic compounds that
have been found to cause increased risk in cancer for humans. (I’m not trying
to ruin your fun when drinking wine, I promise)
·
Improper,
insufficient wastewater treatment and filtering
III. Technological Innovations: Cunningham next looks at
two wastewater treatment technologies that can help alleviate some of the
aforementioned concerns and promote sustainable practices.
I’m no expert, but both
technologies seem to involve treatment that involves adding bio-matter that can
feed off of, or react with the sugars in a way that can result in an easy to
remove the end-product, or
IV. Current Domestic Laws: In this section, the
article looks at the Clean Water Act (“CWA,” which we are discussing today!),
and California’s wine regulations.
·
Clean
Water Act: After a brief discussion of the CWA, the article notes
that under the CWA, wineries are
categorized as point sources because they discharge directly into waters of the
United States. However, they are categorized as a general food producer, not a
more specific regulation directly focused on wineries. The author proposes that
a more specific category could be more effective to address the concerns raised
directly by wineries.
·
California’s
Regulations: California, as a major wine producer, has some regulations
which wineries must comply with at a more specific level. If a winery’s
discharge, but not grape growers, will affect the state’s waters, it must apply
for a General Waste Discharge Requirement permit (WDR) with the Regional Water
Board. If given a WDR permit, the winery must publish a description of their
project, provide that to the board, and give notice to local residences and
businesses. Ultimately, the permit sets effluent limitations and prohibits
discharge to surface waters.
V. International Models: The article next
summarizes some regulations established by South Africa, the European Union,
and Australia, how they differ and how some of those methods could be
implemented in the US.
VI. Proposals: Lastly, the article presents some
proposals to regulate the wine industry and its wastewater. Some proposals
include:
·
Adding the wine industry as a
subcategory within the CWA, with apple/citrus juice producers to ensure that
winery effluents meet stricter and standards specifically focused to the
concerns presented by wineries.
·
Promoting a national policy to
favor sustainable wine production (following the EU’s lead), and provide
subsidies for following newly established “agri-environmental” measures.
·
At the state level, follow
California’s lead, and require permitting specific to winemaking discharge.
VII.
Conclusion: Ultimately the article concludes that the growth of
winemaking needs to be addressed with preemptive law and policy action to
protect the nations water resources from the potential harmful effects of
increased winemaking.
Drink up!
No comments:
Post a Comment